Total Disaster Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $1,155,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clay Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,377 |
22 | Anthony Hiss | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,939 |
23 | Pauline C Facks Rev Trust | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,847 |
24 | Ronald G Dunn | Larwill, IN 46764 | $1,677 |
25 | Joseph Edgar Anderson | Larwill, IN 46764 | $1,583 |
26 | Rj Family Farm LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,568 |
27 | Hinen Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,516 |
28 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,393 |
29 | John F Kleiman | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $995 |
30 | J & C Nicodemus Family Farms LLC | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $978 |
31 | Donald Renbarger | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $766 |
32 | Michael Copp | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $696 |
33 | Tagtmeyer Family Limited Partnership | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $673 |
34 | David Schilling | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $651 |
35 | Hans P Mannes | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $493 |
36 | Kent Richards | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $392 |
37 | Michael Derheimer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $261 |
38 | James A Argerbright | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $234 |
39 | Jeffrey A Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $203 |
40 | S & P Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”