Direct Payment Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 913
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $22,659,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Johnson Riverbend Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $219,669 |
22 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $216,152 |
23 | Daryl Sheiss | Larwill, IN 46764 | $213,673 |
24 | Longville Farms Inc | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $213,047 |
25 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $203,325 |
26 | Woll Family Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $200,459 |
27 | Brent Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $197,856 |
28 | Richard Cox | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $194,928 |
29 | Stanley Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $193,635 |
30 | Peter Rouch | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $188,623 |
31 | James A Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $184,634 |
32 | Jenny L Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $184,413 |
33 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $182,438 |
34 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $180,984 |
35 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $177,381 |
36 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $173,745 |
37 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $169,035 |
38 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $168,235 |
39 | Johnson Bros Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $163,389 |
40 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $162,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”