Conservation Reserve Program in Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51,727
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Iowa totaled $380,529,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ross W Tweedy Trust Tweedy | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $90,560 |
22 | Ronda Kay Smith | Lorimor, IA 50149 | $89,786 |
23 | Thurston Farms | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $88,225 |
24 | Joyce Tracy | Maquoketa, IA 52060 | $87,590 |
25 | Nelson-doneskey Farms | Yucaipa, CA 92399 | $84,997 |
26 | First National Bank ** | Correctionville, IA 51016 | $83,668 |
27 | Jacquelyn Mary Samo | Grundy Center, IA 50638 | $82,699 |
28 | Nelson-doneskey Farms | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $80,479 |
29 | Vaughn Bernard Faber | Blakesburg, IA 52536 | $79,461 |
30 | Kahnert Family General Partnership | Blockton, IA 50836 | $79,285 |
31 | Linda Mumm | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $78,946 |
32 | Lonnie Lee Stein | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $78,819 |
33 | Dba Farms Partnership | Wayland, IA 52654 | $75,790 |
34 | I-80 Farms | Colfax, IA 50054 | $74,724 |
35 | Karen L Stuart-karen L Stuart Revocable Trust | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $73,486 |
36 | Helen M Knockel Trust U/a/d March1, 2006 | Muscatine, IA 52761 | $72,924 |
37 | Duane And Nathan Meyer Joint Venture | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $69,754 |
38 | Robert Tamisiea | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $67,956 |
39 | Cindy S Bakke | Sloan, IA 51055 | $67,910 |
40 | Bernadine Routh | Sharpsburg, IA 50862 | $67,451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”