CCC Organic Programs in Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 357
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Iowa totaled $196,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Daniel J Kubik | Clutier, IA 52217 | $500 |
102 | Kyle J Johnson | Lansing, IA 52151 | $500 |
103 | Michael James Koopmann | Epworth, IA 52045 | $500 |
104 | Virgil Glenn Knobloch | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $500 |
105 | Jonas N Hershberger | Edgewood, IA 52042 | $500 |
106 | Stanton Jeffrey Klinge | Farmersburg, IA 52047 | $500 |
107 | David Dean Shawver | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $500 |
108 | Jonathan Ellsworth Hays | Hamlin, IA 50117 | $500 |
109 | Robert W Helms | Elgin, IA 52141 | $500 |
110 | Tnt Revocable Trust | Barrington, IL 60010 | $500 |
111 | John Robert Ogle | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $500 |
112 | Michael C Lewis | Osage, IA 50461 | $500 |
113 | Mark Alan Nissen | Audubon, IA 50025 | $500 |
114 | Thomas Alphonse Brincks | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $500 |
115 | Wendy M Johnson | Charles City, IA 50616 | $500 |
116 | Donald Joseph Manderfield | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $500 |
117 | Karl Dean Fehr | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $500 |
118 | Marty J Kennedy | Farley, IA 52046 | $500 |
119 | James David Petersen | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $500 |
120 | David Dvorak | West Liberty, IA 52776 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”