Farm Subsidy information
Iowa
Total Subsidies in Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 287,088
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Iowa totaled $39,599,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Haveman Family Farm Ptn | Whiting, IA 51063 | $3,783,038 |
42 | Burt Farm & Livestock Co | Marshalltown, IA 50158 | $3,776,162 |
43 | Flaherty Farms | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $3,764,726 |
44 | Mbs Family Farms | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $3,748,872 |
45 | Eichelberger Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $3,704,259 |
46 | Agri Acres | Manchester, IA 52057 | $3,699,715 |
47 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $3,694,774 |
48 | Iowa Plains Farms | Lake View, IA 51450 | $3,653,210 |
49 | Stanek Brothers Ptnp | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $3,597,105 |
50 | Highway Farms Inc | Ogden, IA 50212 | $3,563,598 |
51 | S & S Farms | Pierson, IA 51048 | $3,554,221 |
52 | Gourley Bros L C | Webster City, IA 50595 | $3,482,746 |
53 | Leonard Broulik & Sons | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $3,475,978 |
54 | Saratoga Partnership | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $3,462,405 |
55 | Brader Brothers | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $3,452,129 |
56 | Demers Farms | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $3,444,443 |
57 | Sonstegard Family Farms | Windom, MN 56101 | $3,424,270 |
58 | Multi-rose Jerseys Inc | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $3,396,727 |
59 | Glassmaker Bros | Cleghorn, IA 51014 | $3,352,212 |
60 | Snb Farm Partnership | Webster City, IA 50595 | $3,347,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”