Farm Subsidy information
Iowa
Total Subsidies in Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 287,088
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Iowa totaled $39,599,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Burco Farms Partnership | Independence, IA 50644 | $4,714,778 |
22 | Ver Steegh Brothers Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $4,641,353 |
23 | Whiskey Creek Ptn | Lawton, IA 51030 | $4,605,980 |
24 | Jade Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $4,541,302 |
25 | Hunter Farms | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $4,502,580 |
26 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $4,494,984 |
27 | Kerrigan Bros | Afton, IA 50830 | $4,281,140 |
28 | Fobian Bros | Iowa City, IA 52240 | $4,271,037 |
29 | Carstens & Sons Farm | Bagley, IA 50026 | $4,235,410 |
30 | Conrad Brothers | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $4,169,391 |
31 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $4,106,826 |
32 | Edler Bros | State Center, IA 50247 | $4,062,453 |
33 | Premier Farms | Walker, IA 52352 | $4,033,080 |
34 | Vosco | Underwood, IA 51576 | $4,009,698 |
35 | Benshoof Farms Partnership | Winterset, IA 50273 | $4,008,166 |
36 | New Era Partnership | Sac City, IA 50583 | $3,991,691 |
37 | Pla-ground Family Farms | Alexander, IA 50420 | $3,988,202 |
38 | Weiland Farms | Garner, IA 50438 | $3,911,260 |
39 | D2k | Boyden, IA 51234 | $3,806,529 |
40 | Amana Farms Inc | Amana, IA 52203 | $3,788,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”