SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,812
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Iowa totaled $389,826,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Menz Farms | Perry, IA 50220 | $296,858 |
22 | Ronald E Joos | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $296,228 |
23 | H & H Farms | Crescent, IA 51526 | $292,760 |
24 | Bartholomew Farms Ltd | Carlisle, IA 50047 | $286,645 |
25 | Uthe Farms Inc | Chariton, IA 50049 | $284,969 |
26 | Jodie Lynn Uthe | Chariton, IA 50049 | $284,940 |
27 | Van Dyke Farms | Reasnor, IA 50232 | $284,328 |
28 | Spring Valley Farms Of Ia Ltd | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $280,230 |
29 | R H & K Enterprises | Dixon, IA 52745 | $278,736 |
30 | Triple A Family Farms General Partnership | Batavia, IA 52533 | $271,316 |
31 | Driskell Farms Partnership | Tabor, IA 51653 | $270,339 |
32 | Burco Farms Partnership | Independence, IA 50644 | $265,920 |
33 | Jerry Mabeus | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $261,816 |
34 | Martha R Mabeus | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $261,801 |
35 | Timothy W Hale | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $261,329 |
36 | Mike Olk Farms | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $259,716 |
37 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $251,799 |
38 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $249,897 |
39 | Joshua Richard Durflinger | Eldon, IA 52554 | $249,501 |
40 | Mbs Family Farms | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $248,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”