Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,478
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Iowa totaled $278,019,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rafael J Morales Sr | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,587,501 |
2 | Lyle Dean Timmerman | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $1,504,427 |
3 | Ricky Earl Wheatley | Adair, IA 50002 | $1,426,206 |
4 | Gary Dean West | Prescott, IA 50859 | $1,403,043 |
5 | Raymond Joseph Gaesser | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,361,001 |
6 | James Erik Anderson | Lenox, IA 50851 | $1,331,092 |
7 | Otto F Petersen Jr | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,311,783 |
8 | Todd Allan Goldsmith | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,306,975 |
9 | Michael Dean Cline | Prescott, IA 50859 | $1,286,214 |
10 | Dougherty Farms Inc | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,227,257 |
11 | Kinsella Feeders Lc | Creston, IA 50801 | $1,211,899 |
12 | Russell Farms Inc | Prescott, IA 50859 | $1,170,431 |
13 | Leo C Kaetzel | Lenox, IA 50851 | $1,084,755 |
14 | Justin Otto Petersen | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,074,019 |
15 | Drake Cattle LLC | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $1,068,652 |
16 | James Vincent Kean | Omaha, NE 68124 | $1,039,618 |
17 | Arnold Dean Eblen - Arnold Eblen Revocable Trust | Creston, IA 50801 | $1,009,702 |
18 | Richard F Hogan | Corning, IA 50841 | $1,007,918 |
19 | Jack R Butler | Omaha, NE 68124 | $978,363 |
20 | Joyce M Jensen Trust | Audubon, IA 50025 | $975,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>