Production Flexibility Program in Allamakee County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,214
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Allamakee County, Iowa totaled $20,055,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Lawrence Byrnes | Dorchester, IA 52140 | $81,764 |
42 | Donovan James Drenth | Waukon, IA 52172 | $80,229 |
43 | Hall William Everman | Postville, IA 52162 | $80,114 |
44 | David L Smith | Mc Gregor, IA 52157 | $78,550 |
45 | Ralph L Hammel | Dorchester, IA 52140 | $78,432 |
46 | Keith Aaron Johnson | Luana, IA 52156 | $77,269 |
47 | Douglas James Zimmerman | Postville, IA 52162 | $76,944 |
48 | Leo James Mccormick | Waterville, IA 52170 | $76,539 |
49 | Elmo Lester Hagen | Waterville, IA 52170 | $75,437 |
50 | Lyle Robert Stock | Waukon, IA 52172 | $74,403 |
51 | Arlyn Ralph Fossum | Waterville, IA 52170 | $73,263 |
52 | Paul Anthony Link | Waukon, IA 52172 | $72,876 |
53 | Timothy Donald Enyart | Postville, IA 52162 | $72,192 |
54 | Cloy Victor Kuhse | Postville, IA 52162 | $71,989 |
55 | Gaylen Lloyd Fruechte | Dorchester, IA 52140 | $71,368 |
56 | James E Moose | Monona, IA 52159 | $69,463 |
57 | Robert L Berns | Cedar Rapids, IA 52411 | $69,393 |
58 | Dennis James Byrnes | Waukon, IA 52172 | $68,127 |
59 | Thomas James Walleser | Lansing, IA 52151 | $67,907 |
60 | Douglas E Weymiller | New Albin, IA 52160 | $67,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”