Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Appanoose County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Appanoose County, Iowa totaled $352,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Josh Randal Wells | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $53,928 |
2 | Davis Bros Farms Inc | Moulton, IA 52572 | $52,933 |
3 | Timothy G Glenn | Plano, IA 52581 | $28,401 |
4 | Kirk Alan Vanderlinden | Numa, IA 52544 | $26,566 |
5 | C & B Davis Partnership | Moulton, IA 52572 | $21,742 |
6 | Vernon Zear Daugherty | Centerville, IA 52544 | $19,889 |
7 | Raymond Joseph Pyle | Albia, IA 52531 | $18,601 |
8 | Porter Farms | Mercer, MO 64661 | $16,784 |
9 | Williamson Iowa Kansas Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $11,169 |
10 | Rock Evans LLC | Centerville, IA 52544 | $11,169 |
11 | Perry Van Daugherty | Centerville, IA 52544 | $9,891 |
12 | Timothy Blayne Wright | Udell, IA 52593 | $9,266 |
13 | Clive L Wells | Plano, IA 52581 | $7,000 |
14 | Porter Farms Inc | Mercer, MO 64661 | $6,934 |
15 | Oak Hills Ranch Inc | Mercer, MO 64661 | $6,933 |
16 | Danny Ray Clark | Savannah, GA 31419 | $5,667 |
17 | Robbie C Singley | Moulton, IA 52572 | $5,595 |
18 | Royce D Joiner | Plano, IA 52581 | $4,750 |
19 | Wayne Allen Wright | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $3,933 |
20 | Jody Clayworth | Centerville, IA 52544 | $3,439 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>