Direct Payment Program in Audubon County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,029
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Audubon County, Iowa totaled $43,903,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Norene Marie Moreland | Audubon, IA 50025 | $148,664 |
82 | Daniel F Wittrock Trust | Hamlin, IA 50117 | $147,940 |
83 | Alan Leroy Jensen | Exira, IA 50076 | $147,773 |
84 | Stanley Andreas Kjergaard | Audubon, IA 50025 | $146,859 |
85 | Russell A Bruhn | Audubon, IA 50025 | $145,534 |
86 | Ronald James Mullenger | Hamlin, IA 50117 | $145,265 |
87 | Roger Dean Larsen | Audubon, IA 50025 | $144,583 |
88 | Robert Edward Hoffman | Audubon, IA 50025 | $143,364 |
89 | Cletus Anthofer | Audubon, IA 50025 | $142,432 |
90 | Maureen Veronica Jensen | Exira, IA 50076 | $141,913 |
91 | David Leroy Hansen | Brayton, IA 50042 | $140,861 |
92 | Randall Herbert Blohm | Audubon, IA 50025 | $138,837 |
93 | Clark James Tibben | Audubon, IA 50025 | $136,601 |
94 | Allan T Hansen | Atlantic, IA 50022 | $135,019 |
95 | Roger Kent Paulsen | Exira, IA 50076 | $135,005 |
96 | Lavern Peter Kommes | Exira, IA 50076 | $134,514 |
97 | Daniel Duane Smith | Exira, IA 50076 | $134,231 |
98 | Dorothy Lucille Kerkhoff | Audubon, IA 50025 | $133,314 |
99 | Kim Lee Krauel | Audubon, IA 50025 | $133,019 |
100 | George Brian Schultes | Exira, IA 50076 | $132,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”