Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Audubon County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 103
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Audubon County, Iowa totaled $1,719,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale M Nelson | Atlantic, IA 50022 | $26,072 |
22 | Gerald Lawrence Schultes | Audubon, IA 50025 | $25,041 |
23 | Mary Ann Schultes | Audubon, IA 50025 | $25,041 |
24 | James Bork Kjergaard | Panora, IA 50216 | $24,493 |
25 | Kay Lorraine Kjergaard | Panora, IA 50216 | $24,493 |
26 | Daniel T Jorgensen | Audubon, IA 50025 | $24,083 |
27 | Elaine M Jorgensen | Audubon, IA 50025 | $24,083 |
28 | Alice Margaret Behrens | Audubon, IA 50025 | $23,380 |
29 | Donald Eugene Schlater | Exira, IA 50076 | $22,321 |
30 | Gary Lee Stearns | Audubon, IA 50025 | $22,113 |
31 | Paul Christofferson | Exira, IA 50076 | $22,031 |
32 | Todd Mitchell Nelsen | Audubon, IA 50025 | $20,738 |
33 | Mcl Farms Inc | Audubon, IA 50025 | $20,387 |
34 | Roger Allen Nelson | Exira, IA 50076 | $20,108 |
35 | Lonn David Kilworth | Exira, IA 50076 | $19,436 |
36 | Gary Dean Bald | Audubon, IA 50025 | $18,779 |
37 | Kyle Stanley Kjergaard | Audubon, IA 50025 | $18,645 |
38 | Megan J0 Kjergaard | Audubon, IA 50025 | $18,645 |
39 | Bradley Neal Weber | Audubon, IA 50025 | $18,140 |
40 | Ruby Jane Paulsen Revocable Trust | Omaha, NE 68106 | $17,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”