Counter Cyclical Program in Benton County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,282
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Benton County, Iowa totaled $14,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Garth Dean Gardemann | Vinton, IA 52349 | $27,950 |
142 | John H Stien | Newhall, IA 52315 | $27,888 |
143 | Douglas Alan Stien | Newhall, IA 52315 | $27,888 |
144 | Louis E Guynn | Mount Auburn, IA 52313 | $27,778 |
145 | John Albert Babinat | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $27,760 |
146 | Doug Albertsen Farms Inc | Elberon, IA 52225 | $27,469 |
147 | Daniel Loren Busch | Keystone, IA 52249 | $27,340 |
148 | John H Lindahl | Vinton, IA 52349 | $27,248 |
149 | Donald H Frese | Watkins, IA 52354 | $27,246 |
150 | Schanbacher Acres Inc | Atkins, IA 52206 | $27,217 |
151 | Kg Inc | Keystone, IA 52249 | $26,968 |
152 | Michael D Kaufman | Dysart, IA 52224 | $26,880 |
153 | Jeff J Boddicker | Newhall, IA 52315 | $26,652 |
154 | Carl A Meyer | Marengo, IA 52301 | $26,606 |
155 | Roettger Farms Inc | Olathe, KS 66062 | $26,380 |
156 | Terry Lee Henkle | Garrison, IA 52229 | $26,270 |
157 | Mark Alan Bierschenk | Shellsburg, IA 52332 | $26,241 |
158 | Mike F Wauters | Belle Plaine, IA 52208 | $26,103 |
159 | Dean-dean & Kelli Ha Haerther | Atkins, IA 52206 | $26,021 |
160 | Larry Donald Root Revocable Trust | Hudson, IA 50643 | $26,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”