Counter Cyclical Program in Black Hawk County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,009
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Black Hawk County, Iowa totaled $11,385,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Strempke | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $41,140 |
62 | Leo M Steimel | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $40,732 |
63 | Ted J Steimel | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $40,731 |
64 | William P Weber | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $39,705 |
65 | Harold C Even | Jesup, IA 50648 | $39,616 |
66 | Jeffrey James Rottinghaus | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $39,399 |
67 | Ted Mahood | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $39,381 |
68 | Dale D Zuck | Jesup, IA 50648 | $39,194 |
69 | Stoutland Farms Inc | Dunkerton, IA 50626 | $38,719 |
70 | Daniel L Waskow | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $38,308 |
71 | Robert L Barz | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $38,291 |
72 | James Barz | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $38,291 |
73 | Twin Rock Farms Inc | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $38,114 |
74 | Roger N Reiter | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $37,800 |
75 | Clifford Trent | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $36,842 |
76 | Craig Michael Schmitz | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $36,789 |
77 | Scott Segebarth | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $36,334 |
78 | Blough Dairy Inc | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $36,246 |
79 | G R Wilson Farms Ltd | Fairbank, IA 50629 | $35,898 |
80 | Meier Farm Corp | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $35,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”