Total Emergency Relief Program in Black Hawk County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 219
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Black Hawk County, Iowa totaled $4,396,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mark Lee Jesse | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $10,894 |
102 | Janelle Glasener Koenigsfeld | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $10,741 |
103 | , | $10,736 | |
104 | Dustin Lynn Kiefer | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $10,416 |
105 | Timothy D Youngblut | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $10,184 |
106 | Leonard C Weber | Dunkerton, IA 50626 | $10,035 |
107 | Robert V Metcalf | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $9,545 |
108 | Dwight N Hilton | New Hartford, IA 50660 | $9,335 |
109 | Matthew Steven Rogers | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $8,866 |
110 | Christian A Brandhorst | Hudson, IA 50643 | $8,732 |
111 | Wayne Fitkin | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $8,726 |
112 | Bernard G Schmitz | Jesup, IA 50648 | $8,672 |
113 | Douglas Kiefer | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $8,486 |
114 | Lonnie P Ollendieck | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $8,478 |
115 | Scott Hultman | Hudson, IA 50643 | $8,241 |
116 | Martin Lee Cornelius | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $7,959 |
117 | Richard L Foulk | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $7,885 |
118 | Charles L Waskow | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $7,845 |
119 | Deer Creek Custom Farming | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $7,722 |
120 | Stephen V Gearhart | Fort Myers Beach, FL 33931 | $7,592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”