Farm Subsidy information
Black Hawk County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Black Hawk County, Iowa, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,069
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Black Hawk County, Iowa totaled $22,068,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Degener Juhl Farm Partnership Llp | Hudson, IA 50643 | $375,663 |
2 | Soymaize Farms | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $338,683 |
3 | Porkhaven Farm Llp | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $221,554 |
4 | Kenneth Kass Inc | Dunkerton, IA 50626 | $207,702 |
5 | K & O Farms Inc | Hudson, IA 50643 | $175,794 |
6 | Ask Farms Inc | Hudson, IA 50643 | $175,157 |
7 | Harold Sorensen | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $164,763 |
8 | Daniel L Waskow | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $159,939 |
9 | William H Hesse | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $151,809 |
10 | Youngblut Farmland Ltd | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $148,095 |
11 | Schneider Schneider Pork Fms Corp | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $140,729 |
12 | Barbara Hershberger-hershberger Revocable Trust | Jesup, IA 50648 | $135,830 |
13 | Mark E Knudsen | Jesup, IA 50648 | $135,597 |
14 | Burington Acres Inc | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $134,100 |
15 | Kraus Farms Inc | Waterloo, IA 50703 | $132,703 |
16 | Raybrock Farms Inc | Jesup, IA 50648 | $131,679 |
17 | Charles L Hesse | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $130,575 |
18 | Rousselow Bros Farms Inc | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $128,057 |
19 | Blough Dairy Inc | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $123,877 |
20 | Robert W Cooper | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $119,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>