Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Buena Vista County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Buena Vista County, Iowa totaled $254,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tracy Bengtson | Alta, IA 51002 | $4,209 |
22 | James Richard Foell | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $4,115 |
23 | James Rowland Selleck | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $3,662 |
24 | Demers Farms | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $3,564 |
25 | Buena Dale Farm Tr | Estherville, IA 51334 | $3,500 |
26 | Lawrence C Foell | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $3,150 |
27 | Kenneth Foell | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $3,129 |
28 | Bethphage Mission Inc | Omaha, NE 68137 | $2,987 |
29 | Charles R Schmitt | Alta, IA 51002 | $1,662 |
30 | Dean Schmitt | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,661 |
31 | David Schmitt | Alta, IA 51002 | $1,661 |
32 | John Stephen Lullman | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,601 |
33 | Ralph E Cole | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,500 |
34 | Steven James Strock | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,471 |
35 | Robert D Strock Jr | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,471 |
36 | James A Strock | Alta, IA 51002 | $1,471 |
37 | Darren Don Jesse | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,333 |
38 | Brent Norman Jesse | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,319 |
39 | Dale Marlyn Schumann | Lakeside, IA 50588 | $1,200 |
40 | Marlyn Dale Schumann | Newell, IA 50568 | $1,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”