Counter Cyclical Program in Buena Vista County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,339
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Buena Vista County, Iowa totaled $12,671,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bovee Ltd | Webb, IA 51366 | $33,692 |
62 | Steve Paul Gustafson | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $33,691 |
63 | Jeffrey Jon Sievers | Newell, IA 50568 | $33,335 |
64 | Dennis Dean Robbins | Alta, IA 51002 | $33,158 |
65 | Allan Richard Pedersen | Alta, IA 51002 | $33,013 |
66 | D Balder Farms Inc | Albert City, IA 50510 | $32,630 |
67 | Fairfield Farms Inc | Albert City, IA 50510 | $32,630 |
68 | Dale Martin Sleezer Jr | Aurelia, IA 51005 | $32,623 |
69 | Brent Norman Jesse | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $32,517 |
70 | Craig Willis Wells | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $32,438 |
71 | Cavanaugh Farms Corp | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $32,375 |
72 | Murray Farm Ltd | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $32,333 |
73 | Pine Grove Farm Inc | Alta, IA 51002 | $31,864 |
74 | Bernard Lee Demers | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $31,818 |
75 | Kevin James Lindquist | Albert City, IA 50510 | $31,636 |
76 | K-webb Inc | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $31,567 |
77 | Allan D Glienke | Alta, IA 51002 | $31,278 |
78 | Kyle Robeson | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $31,210 |
79 | Paul William Merten | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $31,049 |
80 | Keith Everett Movall | Newell, IA 50568 | $31,015 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”