Total Commodity Programs in Buena Vista County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,276
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Buena Vista County, Iowa totaled $314,894,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lee Arthur Demers | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $813,081 |
42 | Pine Grove Farm Inc | Alta, IA 51002 | $802,185 |
43 | Murray Farm Ltd | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $797,654 |
44 | Kevin Dean Cone | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $794,409 |
45 | Paul R Fullenworth | Marathon, IA 50565 | $778,405 |
46 | Dennis Mark Halverson | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $777,706 |
47 | Andrew Kosky | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $773,722 |
48 | Michele J Griswold | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $765,354 |
49 | Eastman Homestead Inc | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $763,444 |
50 | Nesheim Farms Inc | Newell, IA 50568 | $761,269 |
51 | K & C Farms Inc | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $756,542 |
52 | Robert Mitchell Sundblad | Albert City, IA 50510 | $754,000 |
53 | The Schaller Company | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $750,360 |
54 | Douglas Arthur Imming | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $745,445 |
55 | Paul William Merten | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $743,862 |
56 | K-webb Inc | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $740,842 |
57 | Bloom Farms | Albert City, IA 50510 | $733,389 |
58 | D Balder Farms Inc | Albert City, IA 50510 | $731,368 |
59 | Fairfield Farms Inc | Albert City, IA 50510 | $730,297 |
60 | Dennis E Henrichs Revocable Trust | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $723,421 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”