Deficiency Payment in Calhoun County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,809
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Calhoun County, Iowa totaled $5,594,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | David P Flaherty | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,239 |
102 | Morley J Alpers | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,217 |
103 | Douglas L Klocke | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,211 |
104 | Merle J Wuebker | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,193 |
105 | Gary Duane Nicholson | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,187 |
106 | Larry Winkelbauer | Somers, IA 50586 | $10,184 |
107 | Michael D Folsom | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $10,111 |
108 | Norman Allen Vote | Melrose, IA 52569 | $10,069 |
109 | Gabriel Joseph Blaskovich | Lohrville, IA 51453 | $10,050 |
110 | Lane E Bachman | Lake City, IA 51449 | $10,028 |
111 | Weitz Residual Trust Rudolph W | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $10,009 |
112 | Herman E Seil | Farnhamville, IA 50538 | $9,983 |
113 | Larry James Taylor | Farnhamville, IA 50538 | $9,848 |
114 | Warren Clark | Lake City, IA 51449 | $9,844 |
115 | Rick D Brand | Somers, IA 50586 | $9,833 |
116 | Loren Albert Young | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $9,810 |
117 | Dell Blair | Lake City, IA 51449 | $9,787 |
118 | Darrell M Gutz | Pomeroy, IA 50575 | $9,771 |
119 | James A Schubert | Manson, IA 50563 | $9,769 |
120 | Duane Knisley | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $9,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”