Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 4,472
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Iowa totaled $504,434,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard D Dirks | Auburn, IA 51433 | $670,115 |
122 | Robert E Lenz | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $667,650 |
123 | Roger Coon | Lohrville, IA 51453 | $665,409 |
124 | Tom M Weidauer | Pomeroy, IA 50575 | $661,770 |
125 | Kriss Lightner | Lohrville, IA 51453 | $659,593 |
126 | Phillip Noel Maulsby | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $653,177 |
127 | Everett Edwin Hinrichs | Lytton, IA 50561 | $652,886 |
128 | Brent Bergquist | Lohrville, IA 51453 | $651,486 |
129 | Steven Lynn Zierke | Barnum, IA 50518 | $649,836 |
130 | Dean Alan Black | Somers, IA 50586 | $644,925 |
131 | Michael D Spencer | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $640,355 |
132 | Heidemans Inc | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $638,924 |
133 | Bradley T Bleam | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $636,546 |
134 | Ricky Dale Hutchinson | Pomeroy, IA 50575 | $631,666 |
135 | Andrew Hock | Manson, IA 50563 | $628,613 |
136 | Elkland Pork | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $627,148 |
137 | Pamela Meyer | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $621,048 |
138 | Deanna L Miller | Ames, IA 50010 | $609,120 |
139 | Dale L Tasler | Churdan, IA 50050 | $608,481 |
140 | James Corey | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $606,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”