Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Cedar County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 192
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Cedar County, Iowa totaled $4,458,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & T Mather Inc | Tipton, IA 52772 | $58,702 |
22 | Axm Inc | West Liberty, IA 52776 | $58,675 |
23 | Tom Weiland | Stanwood, IA 52337 | $58,656 |
24 | Dawn Weiland | Stanwood, IA 52337 | $58,656 |
25 | Ciha Farms Inc | Mechanicsville, IA 52306 | $57,413 |
26 | Michael A Frymoyer | Moscow, IA 52760 | $51,690 |
27 | James E Petersen | West Branch, IA 52358 | $51,551 |
28 | Linn Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $50,915 |
29 | K & J Mather Corp | West Liberty, IA 52776 | $49,681 |
30 | Keith E Hartwig | Bennett, IA 52721 | $49,199 |
31 | Douglas A Schroeder | Clarence, IA 52216 | $47,547 |
32 | Anderson Farms | Tipton, IA 52772 | $47,467 |
33 | Brian L Licht | Olin, IA 52320 | $47,209 |
34 | I - Ivan Wayne Behre Wayne Behren | Atalissa, IA 52720 | $46,028 |
35 | Barlow Land Company Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $45,037 |
36 | Nichols Youngberg Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $43,628 |
37 | Troy E Vincent | West Branch, IA 52358 | $43,521 |
38 | Paul G Ciha | Lisbon, IA 52253 | $42,612 |
39 | Richard C Garberson | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $41,875 |
40 | R & S Horman Farms Ltd | Wheatland, IA 52777 | $40,248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”