Farm Subsidy information
Cerro Gordo County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Cerro Gordo County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,016
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cerro Gordo County, Iowa totaled $17,535,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doug Studer Farms | Britt, IA 50423 | $316,366 |
| 2 | Dandyland Farms | Garner, IA 50438 | $195,308 |
| 3 | J & R Enterprises LLC | Mason City, IA 50401 | $110,023 |
| 4 | Bgb Farms LLC | Mason City, IA 50401 | $96,368 |
| 5 | Dirksen Dairy LLC | Plymouth, IA 50464 | $85,365 |
| 6 | I-35 Farms | Ankeny, IA 50021 | $80,135 |
| 7 | Behr Family Farm Partnership | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $78,760 |
| 8 | J B Farms A General Partnership | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $72,104 |
| 9 | Thomas C Ashland | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $70,863 |
| 10 | Tommy N Weaver | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $64,892 |
| 11 | Bruns Brothers | Fertile, IA 50434 | $63,047 |
| 12 | Steven Wendel | Mason City, IA 50401 | $62,964 |
| 13 | Eric Adam Arthur | Mason City, IA 50401 | $62,237 |
| 14 | Edward J Caspers Estate | Swaledale, IA 50477 | $59,828 |
| 15 | Barak Brakke | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $56,603 |
| 16 | Charles R Whitt Revocable Trust | Mason City, IA 50401 | $56,466 |
| 17 | Sandra K Whitt Revocable Trust | Mason City, IA 50401 | $56,466 |
| 18 | Behr Ag Inc | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $53,363 |
| 19 | Darmar Ltd | Pine City, MN 55063 | $49,893 |
| 20 | Klak Farms Inc | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $48,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf