Total Conservation Programs in Cerro Gordo County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,409
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cerro Gordo County, Iowa totaled $48,839,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William P Korleski | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $295,255 |
22 | Dean Alan Josten | Ventura, IA 50482 | $284,098 |
23 | Robert Skene | Ventura, IA 50482 | $283,663 |
24 | John W Brietzke | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $280,533 |
25 | Marlin Johnson | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $275,226 |
26 | Roy W Markwardt | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $272,189 |
27 | Doug D Halfpap | Mason City, IA 50401 | $260,968 |
28 | M & P Farmco | Swaledale, IA 50477 | $256,900 |
29 | P & R Farms Inc | Bruce Twp, MI 48065 | $253,178 |
30 | Rick L Levenhagen | Rockford, IA 50468 | $250,977 |
31 | Duane D Coe | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $247,792 |
32 | Paul K Willis | Thornton, IA 50479 | $247,765 |
33 | Arvid F Matson Revoc F Matson | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $245,609 |
34 | Mary Ann Taylor-mary Ann Taylor Living Trust | Council Bluffs, IA 51503 | $239,146 |
35 | D And J Corporation | Swaledale, IA 50477 | $238,131 |
36 | Richard A Halverson | Mason City, IA 50401 | $234,714 |
37 | R & L Realty Co | Mason City, IA 50402 | $226,353 |
38 | Allen M Lathrop | Mason City, IA 50401 | $225,999 |
39 | Connie Jo Davis | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $224,148 |
40 | Donald D Caspers | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $218,022 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”