Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 219
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $973,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stardell Farms Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $13,923 |
22 | Dan Carolan Inc | Lawler, IA 52154 | $13,279 |
23 | Wayne Robert Throndson | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $12,852 |
24 | Steven James Mashek | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $12,572 |
25 | John Patrick Eichenberger | Lawler, IA 52154 | $10,647 |
26 | John Leo Kuehn | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,137 |
27 | Andy N Glaser | Ionia, IA 50645 | $9,889 |
28 | Gregory Gerard Shekleton | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,359 |
29 | Carl Francis Reicks | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,357 |
30 | Jennifer L Woodring | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $8,985 |
31 | Jason John Woodring | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $8,897 |
32 | Jason Bradley Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $8,870 |
33 | Bryan Donald Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $8,870 |
34 | Dale Joseph Rosonke | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $8,820 |
35 | James R0bert Murray | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $8,332 |
36 | Ryan Victor Steege | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $7,686 |
37 | Robert L Rosonke | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,650 |
38 | Cory Kuehn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $7,623 |
39 | Griffin Poppe | Nashua, IA 50658 | $7,623 |
40 | Suhr Dairy | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $7,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”