Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 190
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $507,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $7,559 |
22 | Timothy L Glaser | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,554 |
23 | Laura Lee Schwickerath | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $7,007 |
24 | Harvest Farms Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $6,949 |
25 | Rylan Lee Zwanziger | Nashua, IA 50658 | $6,904 |
26 | Wapsie Valley Farms Ltd | Ionia, IA 50645 | $6,869 |
27 | Regina K Woodring | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $5,940 |
28 | Leslie Buryl Parker Iv | Ionia, IA 50645 | $5,774 |
29 | Underwood Fur & Feed Lc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,675 |
30 | Leasa Marie Lantzky | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,578 |
31 | Christine Marie Hagedorn | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $5,535 |
32 | Linda Ann Zeien | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,004 |
33 | Sharalee B Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $4,713 |
34 | Lois Ann Buchheit | Lawler, IA 52154 | $4,329 |
35 | Michael John Brincks | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $3,968 |
36 | Garrett Lynn Boeding | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $3,967 |
37 | Brock Rye Boeding | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $3,967 |
38 | Jason John Steinlage | Lawler, IA 52154 | $3,665 |
39 | Jason Earl Haeflinger | Elma, IA 50628 | $3,661 |
40 | Tcc Corp | Sumner, IA 50674 | $3,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”