Dairy Programs in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 175
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $4,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Robert Throndson | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $56,410 |
22 | Ralph Francis Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $53,243 |
23 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $49,782 |
24 | Ervin S Martin | Ionia, IA 50645 | $49,726 |
25 | Randy J Franzen | Lawler, IA 52154 | $47,967 |
26 | Gerald Ernest Balk | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $47,931 |
27 | Leo Allen Balk | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $47,441 |
28 | William Martin Gebel | Lawler, IA 52154 | $47,319 |
29 | Daryl J Bouska | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $46,726 |
30 | Balk Bros Ptn | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $44,345 |
31 | Michael E Mahoney | Nashua, IA 50658 | $42,731 |
32 | Jason Bradley Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $42,632 |
33 | Bryan Donald Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $42,632 |
34 | Rory Don Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $42,302 |
35 | Donald M Burgart | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $41,995 |
36 | Maria Elizabeth Janssen | Nashua, IA 50658 | $41,354 |
37 | Richard A Pahnisch | Nashua, IA 50658 | $38,992 |
38 | Roger Dean Vohsman | Nashua, IA 50658 | $37,498 |
39 | Mark Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $36,600 |
40 | Michael C Joebgen | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $35,251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”