Conservation Reserve Program in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 767
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $4,174,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Diane M Kellogg | Ionia, IA 50645 | $29,273 |
22 | Brian R Kellogg | Ionia, IA 50645 | $29,174 |
23 | Michael J Freidhof | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $29,021 |
24 | James George Ashley | Ionia, IA 50645 | $27,778 |
25 | Sue Pleggenkuhle | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $27,227 |
26 | Ronald James Dunn | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $26,089 |
27 | James George Dockendorf | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $25,620 |
28 | Pleggs Inc | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $25,456 |
29 | Curtis Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $25,438 |
30 | William Francis Palmersheim | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $25,158 |
31 | Scott Michael Grove | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $24,939 |
32 | John Robert Hockspeier | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $24,455 |
33 | Gerald Lynn Dietz | Nashua, IA 50658 | $22,928 |
34 | Frederick E Bohaty | Lawler, IA 52154 | $22,794 |
35 | James B Webster | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $22,606 |
36 | , | $22,546 | |
37 | Sharon L Kellogg | Ionia, IA 50645 | $22,524 |
38 | Lynette K Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $22,116 |
39 | , | $22,102 | |
40 | Michael Baltes | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $22,046 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”