Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $400,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael J Kleespies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $1,868 |
22 | Harrington Bros Ptn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $1,778 |
23 | Dan Lester Dietz | Nashua, IA 50658 | $1,736 |
24 | Tony Matthew Jirak | Lawler, IA 52154 | $1,681 |
25 | Jason Richard Hansen | Nashua, IA 50658 | $1,618 |
26 | Robert Joseph Jordan | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $1,601 |
27 | Clifford Peter Schilling | Ionia, IA 50645 | $1,544 |
28 | Martha Mcfarland | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $1,296 |
29 | William Joseph Hoey | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $1,271 |
30 | Travis Michael Swehla | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $1,239 |
31 | Shawn Allen Kuehn | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $1,203 |
32 | Reuben W Kreb | Nashua, IA 50658 | $1,183 |
33 | Lawrence E Springer | Nashua, IA 50658 | $1,145 |
34 | Dale Anthony Throndson | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $1,125 |
35 | Allan Wayne Goodrich | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $1,124 |
36 | Mark C Natvig | Lawler, IA 52154 | $1,081 |
37 | Tyler J Throndson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $1,078 |
38 | Joseph Charles Shileny | Lawler, IA 52154 | $1,066 |
39 | Wayne Randall Gray | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $1,064 |
40 | Darvin James Gray | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $1,064 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”