Market Gains in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 473
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $11,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Duane Francis Lynch | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $115,911 |
22 | Parkay Family Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $114,087 |
23 | Gerald Kenneth Bodensteiner | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $113,337 |
24 | Schulz Farm Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $100,218 |
25 | Leon Andrew Zeien | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $99,724 |
26 | Gaylan Raymond Lynch | Charles City, IA 50616 | $99,713 |
27 | Paul Bernard Kuennen | Lawler, IA 52154 | $98,234 |
28 | Dean Gerard Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $97,908 |
29 | Leon Iver Wait | Nashua, IA 50658 | $96,455 |
30 | James Eugene Shatek | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $95,252 |
31 | Nicholas Lawrence Leibold | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $91,842 |
32 | Sharalee B Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $88,216 |
33 | Robert Paul Savre | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $86,164 |
34 | Donald F Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $85,996 |
35 | Rex Allen Nolte | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $85,164 |
36 | Laures Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $82,523 |
37 | Garth Wayne Griffin | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $81,049 |
38 | Donna Jo Karnik | Fort Atkinson, IA 52144 | $78,784 |
39 | Dennis Lee Boos | Roach, MO 65787 | $75,516 |
40 | David Earl Stolz | Nashua, IA 50658 | $71,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”