Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 77
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $65,377 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dan Carolan Inc | Lawler, IA 52154 | $437 |
42 | Herbert J Meirick | Elma, IA 50628 | $432 |
43 | Jeremy Russell Eichenberger | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $401 |
44 | Robert L Rosonke | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $394 |
45 | Mark C Natvig | Lawler, IA 52154 | $376 |
46 | Dennis John Tieskotter | Lawler, IA 52154 | $360 |
47 | Wayne Randall Gray | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $329 |
48 | Darvin James Gray | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $329 |
49 | Joseph Charles Shileny | Lawler, IA 52154 | $326 |
50 | Clark J Budweg | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $272 |
51 | Dan P Gebel | Lawler, IA 52154 | $257 |
52 | Rodney L Hinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $252 |
53 | Joel Orlo Knutson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $212 |
54 | Mitchell James Murray | Lawler, IA 52154 | $209 |
55 | Jess A Ellingson | Lawler, IA 52154 | $196 |
56 | William H Klassen | Ionia, IA 50645 | $194 |
57 | Neal Reynold Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $189 |
58 | Koenigsfeld Enterprises LLC | Ionia, IA 50645 | $182 |
59 | Nathan J Steere | Nashua, IA 50658 | $169 |
60 | Keith Glaser | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”