Total Emergency Relief Program in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 178
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $2,087,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark Edwin Knoll | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $12,869 |
62 | Julie Ann Eckenrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $12,180 |
63 | John Patrick Eichenberger | Lawler, IA 52154 | $11,662 |
64 | Dennis Anthony King | Lawler, IA 52154 | $11,546 |
65 | Lyle Dietzenbach | Protivin, IA 52163 | $11,472 |
66 | Bernard G Eichenberger | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $11,423 |
67 | Peter Eugene Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $11,223 |
68 | Balik Farms LLC | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $10,933 |
69 | James Donald Eckenrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,592 |
70 | Mark Joseph Ptacek | Lawler, IA 52154 | $10,489 |
71 | Thomas Alphonse Brincks | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $10,470 |
72 | , | $10,109 | |
73 | Michael Joseph Winter | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,073 |
74 | Christopher Thomas Carolan | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $9,599 |
75 | Arden Leo Lembcke | Andover, MN 55304 | $9,455 |
76 | Joseph William Rosenbaum | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $9,025 |
77 | , | $8,973 | |
78 | Jeremy C Rosonke | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $8,240 |
79 | Allan L Franzen | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $7,862 |
80 | Tony Matthew Jirak | Lawler, IA 52154 | $7,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”