Market Gains in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 473
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $11,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven James Breitbach | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $52,821 |
62 | Charles Earl Speicher | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $52,225 |
63 | Joseph Charles Meirick | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $51,267 |
64 | Gary Lee Kalvig | Ionia, IA 50645 | $50,855 |
65 | Darrell Lee Crooks | Ionia, IA 50645 | $50,842 |
66 | Norman Edwin Wurzer | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $48,825 |
67 | Comeback Farms Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $48,079 |
68 | Eugene Bernard Brincks | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $47,046 |
69 | Harrington Bros Ptn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $46,087 |
70 | Lone Willow Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $45,709 |
71 | Duane Richard Boos | Lake City, MN 55041 | $45,030 |
72 | Kurt Ervin Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $44,971 |
73 | Dwight David Kolthoff | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $42,212 |
74 | David Gerard Tilkes | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $42,094 |
75 | Jerry James Rochford | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $41,845 |
76 | Joel David Meyer | Sumner, IA 50674 | $41,603 |
77 | Dennis P Troyna | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $41,544 |
78 | Allen Jerome Heit | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $40,622 |
79 | Harvey Bernard Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $40,539 |
80 | Jimmy Alfred Haeflinger | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $40,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”