Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 107
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $400,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Billy T Bearman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $269 |
82 | Koenigsfeld Enterprises LLC | Ionia, IA 50645 | $262 |
83 | Rodney L Hinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $252 |
84 | Debra Ann Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $239 |
85 | Neal Reynold Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $238 |
86 | Jess A Ellingson | Lawler, IA 52154 | $235 |
87 | Tony Wygle | Ionia, IA 50645 | $202 |
88 | Timothy L Glaser | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $198 |
89 | James R0bert Murray | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $168 |
90 | Leo Allen Balk | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $167 |
91 | Philip Leo Glaser | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $165 |
92 | Arlie E Stange | Lawler, IA 52154 | $161 |
93 | Jeffrey D Ameling | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $154 |
94 | Melvin Leonard Balk | Lawler, IA 52154 | $149 |
95 | Marvin Leo Balk | Lawler, IA 52154 | $149 |
96 | Rick Hammond | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $144 |
97 | Craig J Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $126 |
98 | Wayne Robert Throndson | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $113 |
99 | Janet Lynn Pratt | Nashua, IA 50658 | $94 |
100 | Travis Dean Suckow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $91 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”