Deficiency Payment in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 938
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $4,003,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kenneth E Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,499 |
102 | Donald Patrick Blazek Jr | Lawler, IA 52154 | $10,263 |
103 | John F Paulus | Ionia, IA 50645 | $10,257 |
104 | Harvest Farms Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $10,124 |
105 | Paul Bernard Kuennen | Lawler, IA 52154 | $10,090 |
106 | Daniel Dean Speicher | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,006 |
107 | Harold Raymond Lantow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $9,998 |
108 | James Leroy Boos | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,930 |
109 | Harrington Bros Ptn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $9,854 |
110 | Burton E Dietz | Nashua, IA 50658 | $9,798 |
111 | David James Wenthold | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $9,748 |
112 | Steven James Breitbach | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,608 |
113 | Richard Dean Breitbach | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,608 |
114 | Gary L Poppe | Ionia, IA 50645 | $9,558 |
115 | Glen D Poppe | Nashua, IA 50658 | $9,558 |
116 | Calvin K Poppe | Nashua, IA 50658 | $9,558 |
117 | Larry A Tupper | Ionia, IA 50645 | $9,558 |
118 | Gary Wayne Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,514 |
119 | John Francis Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $9,493 |
120 | Thomas Leonard Recker | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $9,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”