Total Emergency Relief Program in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 185
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $2,310,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donald Alfred Mueterthies | Lawler, IA 52154 | $7,016 |
102 | Suhr Dairy | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $6,938 |
103 | Jason Lee Maklenburg | Lawler, IA 52154 | $6,904 |
104 | Leo Allen Balk | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $6,840 |
105 | Nicholas Joseph Winter | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $6,715 |
106 | Allen W Eckenrod | Poulsbo, WA 98370 | $6,515 |
107 | Judy Janice Maloy | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $6,459 |
108 | James Cyril Gebel | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $6,443 |
109 | Gerald Stanley Busta | Lawler, IA 52154 | $6,363 |
110 | Joe Arens | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $6,187 |
111 | David Ray Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $6,141 |
112 | William J Zubrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $6,063 |
113 | Keith Gerard Busta | Lawler, IA 52154 | $6,032 |
114 | Anthony William Zwanziger | Nashua, IA 50658 | $6,008 |
115 | Tony E Kobliska | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $5,916 |
116 | Joseph Charles Meirick | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $5,513 |
117 | Trent Lechtenberg | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,360 |
118 | Scott J Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $5,314 |
119 | John Albert Kuhn | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,213 |
120 | James J Kuhn | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”