Market Gains in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 473
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $11,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael Henry Tilkes | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $31,536 |
102 | Larry Lavern Stange | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $31,485 |
103 | Donna Lee Copper | Ionia, IA 50645 | $31,325 |
104 | Seamans Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $31,286 |
105 | Steven John Kuehn | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $31,019 |
106 | David James Wenthold | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $30,645 |
107 | Tim Joseph Kuehn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $30,470 |
108 | Harold Raymond Lantow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $30,336 |
109 | John Leo Kuehn | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $30,299 |
110 | John Francis Gebel | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $30,169 |
111 | D & D Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $29,763 |
112 | Brahn Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $29,625 |
113 | Alan John Bohr | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $29,542 |
114 | Jeff William Eichenberger | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $29,493 |
115 | Theodore Steege III | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $28,574 |
116 | Gordon N Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $28,031 |
117 | Dale Robert Nosbisch | Ionia, IA 50645 | $27,854 |
118 | Faythe Elizabeth Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $27,026 |
119 | Balik Farms LLC | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $26,750 |
120 | Norman C Heit | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $26,022 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”