Market Gains in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 473
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $11,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Bernard John Krizan | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $25,988 |
122 | Leroy Herman Geerts | Charles City, IA 50616 | $25,929 |
123 | Randall Lee Miller | Ionia, IA 50645 | $25,577 |
124 | Kevin Leo Zwanziger | Nashua, IA 50658 | $25,572 |
125 | James Clark Zwanziger Jr | Nashua, IA 50658 | $24,950 |
126 | Gary Lee Griffin | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $24,802 |
127 | Donald John Beck | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $24,738 |
128 | Boedeker Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $24,599 |
129 | Luke Alex Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $24,390 |
130 | Shirley Jean Frost | Nashua, IA 50658 | $24,369 |
131 | C-t Farms Corp | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $24,037 |
132 | Robert Michael Harrington Jr | Nashua, IA 50658 | $23,813 |
133 | Bruce Erwin Qualley | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $23,415 |
134 | Edson Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $23,042 |
135 | Donald Joseph Busta | Lawler, IA 52154 | $22,750 |
136 | Donald Leif Anderson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $22,621 |
137 | Pleggenkuhle Farms Inc | Sumner, IA 50674 | $21,970 |
138 | Randy Edward Shatek | Lawler, IA 52154 | $21,719 |
139 | Wayne Randall Gray | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $21,489 |
140 | Lyle V Steege | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $21,408 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”