Market Gains in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 473
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $11,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Darin Lee Bush | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $21,120 |
142 | Thomas Leroy Schwickerath | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $20,832 |
143 | James Everest Geerts | Charles City, IA 50616 | $20,770 |
144 | Marion C Cagley | Ionia, IA 50645 | $20,649 |
145 | Harlan Wayne Throndson | Lawler, IA 52154 | $20,554 |
146 | Roger Bernard Desloover | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $20,536 |
147 | Charles Albert Orvis | Lawler, IA 52154 | $20,524 |
148 | Craig Alan Groothuis | Nashua, IA 50658 | $20,411 |
149 | Allan Richard Shindelar | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $20,369 |
150 | Kenneth Raphael Heying | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $20,311 |
151 | Shekleton Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $20,210 |
152 | Leon Charles Sheets | Ionia, IA 50645 | $19,955 |
153 | Patrick Joseph Oneill | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $19,953 |
154 | Lawrence L Seamans | Ionia, IA 50645 | $19,898 |
155 | Donald J Eslinger | Des Moines, IA 50312 | $19,866 |
156 | Ronald James Heit | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $19,623 |
157 | Plum Creek Farm Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $19,523 |
158 | Wayne Albert Bodensteiner | Lawler, IA 52154 | $19,379 |
159 | Dean Lyle Mohling | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $19,001 |
160 | Charles Arthur Huber | Lawler, IA 52154 | $18,810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”