Farm Subsidy information
Chickasaw County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 922
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $15,342,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carl Francis Reicks | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $90,301 |
2 | Dean Gerard Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $73,439 |
3 | William Francis Palmersheim | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $67,979 |
4 | Schulz Farm Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $67,284 |
5 | John Patrick Eichenberger | Lawler, IA 52154 | $58,245 |
6 | Rylan Lee Zwanziger | Nashua, IA 50658 | $54,461 |
7 | Virgil B Hoy | Nashua, IA 50658 | $53,413 |
8 | James E Huber | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $49,443 |
9 | Kristie Brincks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $48,017 |
10 | Michael Francis Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $45,567 |
11 | Amanda Knutson | Chicago, IL 60647 | $45,488 |
12 | Emily Dust | Chicago, IL 60657 | $45,488 |
13 | Richard D White | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $45,080 |
14 | Wapsie Valley Farms Ltd | Ionia, IA 50645 | $44,189 |
15 | James Everest Geerts | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,598 |
16 | Kaylie D Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $42,323 |
17 | Brian R Kellogg | Ionia, IA 50645 | $42,021 |
18 | Michael J Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $41,934 |
19 | Madonna A Cashman | Waverly, IA 50677 | $41,681 |
20 | Bryce Rickey Elliott | Sumner, IA 50674 | $41,151 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>