Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 164
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $3,403,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laures Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $171,481 |
| 2 | Cedar Ridge Farms Ptn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $135,200 |
| 3 | Boeding Brothers Dairy L C | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $126,778 |
| 4 | Schulz Farm Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $101,069 |
| 5 | James Eugene Shatek | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $98,516 |
| 6 | D & D Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $85,801 |
| 7 | Ricky Joseph Throndson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $79,325 |
| 8 | Parkay Family Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $75,246 |
| 9 | Julianne M Gorman Living Trust | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $75,070 |
| 10 | Gary J Gorman Living Trust | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $75,070 |
| 11 | Nicholas Lawrence Leibold | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $70,324 |
| 12 | Thomas Leonard Recker | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $69,851 |
| 13 | Kevin Leo Zwanziger | Nashua, IA 50658 | $64,154 |
| 14 | Seamans Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $63,705 |
| 15 | Shanon George Maloy | Ionia, IA 50645 | $57,603 |
| 16 | Springwood Enterprises Inc | Mason City, IA 50401 | $56,018 |
| 17 | Betty A O'brien | Sumner, IA 50674 | $55,167 |
| 18 | David P O'brien | Sumner, IA 50674 | $54,947 |
| 19 | Gary Joseph Swehla | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $53,196 |
| 20 | David Vearl Edson | Ionia, IA 50645 | $49,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf