Conservation Reserve Program in Clarke County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,725
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clarke County, Iowa totaled $109,813,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gary A Bristle | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $280,848 |
82 | Ohair Farms LLC | Van Wert, IA 50262 | $279,926 |
83 | Gus George Garvis | Woodburn, IA 50275 | $279,523 |
84 | Roy Charles Graves | Osceola, IA 50213 | $279,008 |
85 | Emmet Brody | West Des Moines, IA 50265 | $276,275 |
86 | G Allen Heston Trust | Prairie City, IA 50228 | $275,565 |
87 | Ronald Jackson | Murray, IA 50174 | $269,686 |
88 | Charles L Schneiders | Des Moines, IA 50317 | $268,865 |
89 | Gary D Epperly | Albia, IA 52531 | $266,518 |
90 | Kevin D Updike | Osceola, IA 50213 | $265,452 |
91 | Matthew G Bauer Irrevocable Trust | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $263,403 |
92 | Jack R Kilpatrick Trust | Lorimor, IA 50149 | $260,910 |
93 | Larry A Kilpatrick Trust | Lorimor, IA 50149 | $259,071 |
94 | Larry Bear | Thayer, IA 50254 | $258,324 |
95 | Cort K Jaeschke | Clare, IA 50524 | $254,634 |
96 | Jeff W Kirk | Peru, IA 50222 | $252,453 |
97 | Steven Chamberlain | Lorimor, IA 50149 | $251,450 |
98 | Phillips Family Farms LLC | Osceola, IA 50213 | $251,247 |
99 | William K Jaeschke Jr | Moorland, IA 50566 | $250,892 |
100 | Monte R Kahler Revocable Trust | Bolivar, MO 65613 | $249,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”