Production Flexibility Program in Dallas County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,763
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Dallas County, Iowa totaled $33,998,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert E Fox | Minburn, IA 50167 | $171,867 |
22 | Brenton Farm Inc | Norwalk, IA 50211 | $169,422 |
23 | William A Ory | Earlham, IA 50072 | $162,264 |
24 | Little Family Farms Corp | Redfield, IA 50233 | $160,208 |
25 | Dan Harney | Woodward, IA 50276 | $153,282 |
26 | Mark W Ellerman | Dallas Center, IA 50063 | $143,917 |
27 | Michael Joseph Smith | Woodward, IA 50276 | $143,766 |
28 | Central Plains Ag | Panora, IA 50216 | $143,358 |
29 | Edward Jordan | Adel, IA 50003 | $141,967 |
30 | Peoples Farm Corp | Perry, IA 50220 | $141,614 |
31 | Willow Springs Inc | Jamaica, IA 50128 | $139,749 |
32 | Samuel J Spellman | Woodward, IA 50276 | $139,429 |
33 | Maurice Herr | Waukee, IA 50263 | $139,194 |
34 | Wm Fox Farm Co | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $137,304 |
35 | Forret Farms Inc | Adel, IA 50003 | $134,053 |
36 | Michael Hansen Farms Inc | Bouton, IA 50039 | $131,554 |
37 | Alan And Peter Wicks Partnership | Adel, IA 50003 | $131,369 |
38 | Gerald Spellman | Granger, IA 50109 | $130,886 |
39 | R & J Patten Farms Inc | Redfield, IA 50233 | $130,742 |
40 | Thomas E Lauterbach | Van Meter, IA 50261 | $130,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”