Direct Payment Program in Des Moines County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,256
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Des Moines County, Iowa totaled $36,038,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matthew T Parrott | Danville, IA 52623 | $254,264 |
22 | Tall Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $250,733 |
23 | Denney Brothers Inc | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $245,276 |
24 | Joe Wischmeier Inc | Burlington, IA 52601 | $240,146 |
25 | Dan Keitzer Ltd | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $228,935 |
26 | Broadview Farms | Danville, IA 52623 | $225,572 |
27 | David Baker Inc | Morning Sun, IA 52640 | $224,457 |
28 | Jls Farms Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $222,695 |
29 | Thomas O Steiner | Oakville, IA 52646 | $222,577 |
30 | Bradley Ellsworth Dodds | New London, IA 52645 | $218,557 |
31 | Randy Meeker | Burlington, IA 52601 | $215,207 |
32 | Donald H Fischer | Morning Sun, IA 52640 | $214,912 |
33 | Ray Robertson | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $213,417 |
34 | Fred Joseph Vantiger | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $202,412 |
35 | Brock Clayton Beckman | Danville, IA 52623 | $192,979 |
36 | Charlie Nealey Farm Inc | Danville, IA 52623 | $192,685 |
37 | Country Lane Farms Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $190,274 |
38 | Darbyshire Farm Corp | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $186,033 |
39 | Gary Beckman | Danville, IA 52623 | $182,160 |
40 | Greg Mclaughlin | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $182,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”