Production Flexibility Program in Des Moines County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,196
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Des Moines County, Iowa totaled $22,775,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brader Brothers | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $424,832 |
2 | Abel Brothers Partnership | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $282,842 |
3 | Parrott Farms Inc | Burlington, IA 52601 | $226,651 |
4 | Broadview Farms | Danville, IA 52623 | $221,866 |
5 | Mark Breder Ltd | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $217,422 |
6 | William B Tucker | New London, IA 52645 | $216,877 |
7 | H Hillyard Livestock Farm Corp | Burlington, IA 52601 | $205,782 |
8 | Curtis Pflum | Burlington, IA 52601 | $200,652 |
9 | Darwin D Campbell | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $171,850 |
10 | Grin Inc | Danville, IA 52623 | $169,439 |
11 | Roscoe Agri Corp | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $165,348 |
12 | Mgm Farms Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $162,784 |
13 | David Baker Inc | Morning Sun, IA 52640 | $155,152 |
14 | Ricky Allan Wirt | Burlington, IA 52601 | $148,924 |
15 | Nelson Brothers Partnership | Morning Sun, IA 52640 | $144,756 |
16 | Consolidated Properties Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $144,640 |
17 | Metairie Ltd | Middletown, IA 52638 | $143,242 |
18 | Beck Brothers | Danville, IA 52623 | $142,418 |
19 | Seymour Farms Ltd | Danville, IA 52623 | $141,727 |
20 | Lee C Robertson | Oakville, IA 52646 | $140,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>