Conservation Reserve Program in Dubuque County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 437
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dubuque County, Iowa totaled $2,443,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Allan Griffin | Peosta, IA 52068 | $11,935 |
62 | Kathleen Sue Kramer | Cascade, IA 52033 | $11,655 |
63 | Pfeiler Brothers Farm Inc | Holy Cross, IA 52053 | $11,629 |
64 | Ronald R Then | Bernard, IA 52032 | $11,078 |
65 | Grandpa And Grandma Smith's Pond LLC | Dubuque, IA 52001 | $11,062 |
66 | Corporation Of New Melleray | Peosta, IA 52068 | $10,806 |
67 | Brian D Preston | Dubuque, IA 52003 | $10,677 |
68 | Susan Hellert | Dubuque, IA 52002 | $10,536 |
69 | Luke Michael Casey | Epworth, IA 52045 | $10,464 |
70 | Marlene Brimeyer | Dubuque, IA 52002 | $10,456 |
71 | Steve J Gulick | Dyersville, IA 52040 | $10,416 |
72 | Lorelei Revocable Trust | Dubuque, IA 52003 | $10,342 |
73 | Jefferey J Lucas | Holy Cross, IA 52053 | $10,254 |
74 | Gerald Lyons | Bernard, IA 52032 | $10,151 |
75 | Jjs Real Estate, LLC | Dubuque, IA 52001 | $10,110 |
76 | Larry Leon Steffensmeier | Dyersville, IA 52040 | $9,995 |
77 | Flynn Investment Company L L C | Dubuque, IA 52003 | $9,866 |
78 | Roger Baylor | Sherrill, IA 52073 | $9,812 |
79 | Peter Benjamin Klein | Peosta, IA 52068 | $9,804 |
80 | Mark Gerard Stelken | Dyersville, IA 52040 | $9,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”