Market Gains in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 557
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $16,931,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | T And T Farms L L C | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $137,682 |
22 | Jrc Farms L L C | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $137,679 |
23 | Dennis Lloyd Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $137,531 |
24 | Donald Harry Jensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $132,321 |
25 | A D H Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $128,277 |
26 | Dennis G Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $127,447 |
27 | L Steven Hanson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $126,412 |
28 | Lance Eric Origer | Estherville, IA 51334 | $121,501 |
29 | Darryl Wayne Hansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $120,765 |
30 | Mark James Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $119,180 |
31 | Sligo Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $115,280 |
32 | Michael Mart | Estherville, IA 51334 | $114,174 |
33 | John Edward Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $112,420 |
34 | Richard Alan Sturm | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $110,615 |
35 | Daniel Lee Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $110,342 |
36 | Monty Lee Miller | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $109,706 |
37 | Richard James Mckean | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $109,696 |
38 | Tom R Ross | Estherville, IA 51334 | $107,186 |
39 | Lowell Dean Christensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $106,834 |
40 | David Paul Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $106,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”