Counter Cyclical Program in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 817
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $9,155,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Randy Jon Quastad | Estherville, IA 51334 | $32,090 |
62 | Leroy Victor Forsberg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $32,042 |
63 | Mark C Olson | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $31,564 |
64 | Michael Mart | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,261 |
65 | Simon & Sons Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,157 |
66 | Michael Alan Gage | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $31,061 |
67 | John Edward Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $30,906 |
68 | Gordon Ray Juhl | Estherville, IA 51334 | $30,883 |
69 | Ronald Lee Olson | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $30,719 |
70 | Schmitt Farms | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $30,680 |
71 | Rick Eggers | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $30,620 |
72 | Donald Arthur Valen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $30,549 |
73 | Sligo Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $30,348 |
74 | Clausen Land & Cattle Co | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $29,925 |
75 | Bernie Ernest Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $29,799 |
76 | Craig Lee White | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,613 |
77 | Charles Raymond Gardner | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,541 |
78 | Donald Harry Jensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $28,581 |
79 | Gregory Dean Anderson | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $28,407 |
80 | James Alvin Devore | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $28,259 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”