Total Disaster Programs in Emmet County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 373
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $6,671,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Allen James Meyer | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $33,036 |
62 | Jrc Farms L L C | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $32,695 |
63 | Kathy Mae Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $32,343 |
64 | Delmer Lee Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $32,343 |
65 | Joe Greig | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,993 |
66 | Jodie G Greig | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,993 |
67 | Doug Young Family Farms Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $30,296 |
68 | Luke Farm Corporation | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $30,114 |
69 | Dkh Inc | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $30,103 |
70 | Dennis James Hoffman | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,603 |
71 | Madison Farm Enterprises Ltd | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,578 |
72 | Christopher Hoffman | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,173 |
73 | Lclk Inc | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $28,934 |
74 | Gary Lynn Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $28,451 |
75 | Bruce Allan Chrestiansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $28,384 |
76 | Roger Melvin Lindell | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $28,334 |
77 | Daryl D Luke | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $28,248 |
78 | Arnold Goodman Twait | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $28,080 |
79 | Neal John Ruschy | Estherville, IA 51334 | $28,000 |
80 | Daniel Raymond Christensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $27,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”