Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 473
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $2,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gordon Ray Juhl | Estherville, IA 51334 | $8,722 |
62 | Tno Farms LLC | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $8,526 |
63 | Matthew J Richard | Estherville, IA 51334 | $8,441 |
64 | Sligo Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $8,416 |
65 | Ronald Frank Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $8,350 |
66 | Ronald Allen Olson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $8,166 |
67 | Larry Laverne Jensen | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $8,141 |
68 | Ward Thomas Harsin | Estherville, IA 51334 | $8,014 |
69 | Tim Duane Oleson | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $7,998 |
70 | Randy Joel Peltz | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $7,914 |
71 | Olson & Olson LLC | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $7,903 |
72 | Jerome Robert Schacherer | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,890 |
73 | David Paul Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,884 |
74 | Robin Renee Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,884 |
75 | Leroy Victor Forsberg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,809 |
76 | Carson V Forsberg | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $7,809 |
77 | C & J Farm Partnership | Swea City, IA 50590 | $7,707 |
78 | Mark Richard Larsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $7,608 |
79 | Keith Richard Rosburg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,546 |
80 | Dennis G Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $7,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”